To the Rathgic way
of getting from A to B
THANK YOU for visitng
4246 No 103rd Ave #12
Phoenix, Arizona 85037
THE PURPOSE OF RATHGIC
The purpose of RATHGIC AND THIS SITE is to provide a focus point for those that come to understand and believe that all livings things, and human's in particular, were born into a reality of the universe that over billions of years of filtering .... what works and what doesn't .... is a collection of forces and relationships far more powerful that any that human's are likely to produce. and by that definition will, almost, if not always, prevail.
Humans, world wide, experience these Reality forces and relationships EXACTLY THE SAME WAY. And it is this common experience, that all share, that binds humans, otherwise free .... together in a common responsibility:
Humans, world wide, have NO PRACTICAL CHOICE but to seek to be in "sync" with reality .... if they want to succeed in moving from where they are at(point A) .... to where they chose to want to go or have happen(point B).
To that end RATHGIC is, among other things a tool box of SEARCH TOOLS designed to identify those aspects of Realty that are relevant to meeting the aforesaid responsibility .... if we want to succeed. So that when we then create the processes, and means to get to point B we are far quicker, efficient and reliable in producing a WORKABLE result .... a basic threshold key of which is to be aware of .... so we can be in sync with .... the REALITY RELATIONSHIPS we can do nothing about.
Obviously, the prime assumption of Rathgic that human's have no choice but to be in sync with the Reality into which all humans were born world wide has been present and governs us, since the start of our evolution, whether humans have been aware of it and/or articulated it.
That does not mean, however, that humans can not also experience the illusion of success short term only that be definition Reality grinds with the sands of time, exceedingly small over time that which is not in sync with it. Reality isn't a "supervisor" of what humans do. It simply merges things .... all things relevant to a situation .... as the relative characteristics determine in the merger process.
As an example: long standing orbits are the result of the respective forces of the earth and the sun (the inherent perpendicular tangent speed of the earth and the inherent huge gravity force of the sun, in relationship to that of the earth, always being a bit out of sync. But the reality also of the feedback "in sync" charactistics of both allow the out of sync temporary situation, to reverse itself before it gets to the limits of its corrective action.
One can anticipate then, that the key to long term success IS NOT EQUALITY. Rather it is the combination of individual forces that are approximately in sync and can work together .... and .... and .... and A RELATIONSHIP THAT INCLUDES FEEDBACK CAPABILITIES OF BOTH .... that in FACT CAN MOTIVATE BOTH ....to adjust to reverse the limited "out of sync" temporary condition that almost always exist .... to create a zig zag pattern across a middle workable norm.
So, if equality is not essential to the big picture reality forces, then should it be the "be all and end all" standard for Humans? I leave the answer to you. Rathgic "search" processes are specifically designed to accomplish the following for practical, efficient, reasons for a high degree of long term success:
AND WHEN WE DO THAT .... I SUGGEST THAT HUMANS CAN DO EXTRAORDINARY THINGS THAT EVEN REALITY CAN NOT DO.
An example: The sun provides our necessary heat and light energy. But its light bulb comes on at sunrise and turns off at sunset each day every day forever! But our light bulbs we have designed come on when we want them to, day or night. Forever. But how forever? Because we also designed the feedback system to have available "extra light bulbs" readily available that can replace our creation ie: non permanent light bulbs! The basic wiring system last for a life time. And we also create the research systems to provide more efficient and less costly replacements. And it works .... world wide just like reality does. Well, almost.
There is one difference. Reality is 100% reliable .... not right or wrong .... not within the "moral standards" humans create for themselves .... just reliable. In fact, one can note that it is these patterns of reliability that much of human knowledge to be accumulated.
Because it is aware of ALL RELEVANT FORCES AND RELATIONSHIPS PRESENT IN A GIVEN SITUATION .... and takes them into account. Those that can merge do so. If they can not, then things are changed, perhaps violent to create new entities that move away from each other and go their own way into space. What is amazing is that in reality that is an alternative that seldom happens. Usually if a feedback relationship doesn't develop between large objects they simply pass each other by and go on their own path.
And it usually happens among large objects because gravity is the least powerful of forces. And as they get closer, the ANGLE OF APPLICATION of gravity force, (so far not taken into account by the intellectual community, among many others) becomes less and less effective after passing the tangent point of application .... and each then just goes on its own way based primarily on its own mass times its own speed force.
I suggest its only when the mass is relatively small, like that of a meteorite, that the gravity force of the much larger object prevails and continually draws it closer and closer.... As the meteorite's mass times its speed is no match, what ever the angle of application of it is with the meteorite.
And it is why orbits of large objects in space only occur between a large central force and much smaller orbiting bodies. (The assertion of "binary orbits" existing by equal masses, by the intellectual community to the contrary, not withstanding) not being possible for the same reason.
And looking ahead, I will mention that it is also obvious and can be easily shown .... that the very long term intellectual assertion of a workable computation of the gravity force itself .... is patently unworkable on its face. But, they don't see it. And this inability to see reality is the reason they created the explanation of Black Holes .... for distant computations of gravity at long distances that were inconsistent with what they perceived they "observed"!
For the moment, I will publish the above. I am also very interested in other's views of what I have presented. However, the "internet" means of comments numbering in the thousands .... neither you or I have the time to deal with them if present in the form most of them take. I am working on finding an effective alternative, but not close to a solution. You may write to me and I will allocate some time each week to whatever pile accumulates during that week. I see no choice, at the moment, but then to store them and start next week with an empty box, for the moment. But that may not be a problem. I'm very aware, having practiced law for 40 years .... that humans, in general, place learning something different from what they perceive to be true, as very low on their priority list. In fact, it is one of the questions that motivated me to undertake what turned out to be RATHGIC. Why, time and again did two clients, each with their own attorney .... look at the EXACT SAME REALITY, and yet each not only insist their version is workable .... but each doesn't have a clue as to what the other "sees" that is unworkable in their own position. Not unlike the 2016 Presidential Election, by both parties!